| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WBAN's Top Ten "Pet
Peeves"
in the Sport!
By Sue TL Fox
Updated: February 4, 2013
Original/May 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
(FEB 4, 2013)
WBAN can see the
progress that women’s boxing has made since 1998 when first
being published on the Internet….BUT WBAN has listed its Top 10
“Pet Peeves” that continues to raise its ugly head in the sport!
|
Television Networks that continue to discriminate against women
boxers. These networks can give all of the excuses they care
to about the "reasons" of why they do not put women on their
televised segment on their cards----BUT in the opinion of WBAN
it is no more than a sleazy disguise for discrimination.
WBAN originally wrote this in 2003...Has anything changed?
Unfortunately not really. Even after the women were included
in the 2012 Olympics and the sport has significantly grown with many
skillful boxers---they still yet to include women on their networks.
|
|
Promoters continuing to find “soft” opponents for “their” fighters,
and ignoring the fact that boxing fans pay good money to see a
competitive match----not to see a superior opponent have a
walk-through with an inept opponent. As of 2013, with this
originally been written in 2003, we still see this practice going
on.
|
|
Fighters that ARE the best not getting opportunities---especially on
television, and seeing these boxers retire out of frustration.
Update as of October 2013: No change. There are
so many great female boxers in the sport that just cannot get active
enough on cards.
|
|
Fighters ducking fighters….and getting away with ducking and being
able to fight lamer than lame opponents---AND defrauding the public
by phoney hype, etc. that they are the best in the sport, which in
many cases is far from the truth. [Written in 2003]
I believe in 2013 we are seeing many more quality fights, whereas in
2003, it was much more prevalent for fighters ducking fighters.
We have come a long way in 10 years, and I believe that the strength
of the amateurs is what is making the sport finally reach new and
higher levels of skillful female boxers in the sport.
|
|
(2003) Promoters offering fights to women, just to cancel their
events, or not fulfill their offer to that particular boxer.
Update as of October 2006: We are also seeing boxers take
fights, just to cancel out with short notice. |
|
(2003) Hometown decisions.
Making it nearly impossible many times for a boxer from
another area to win a fight without a knockout, and is lucky to get
a way with a draw when they clearly won.
Update as of October 2013:
NO CHANGE in 2013! These decisions continue to be as controversial
as usual. |
|
Low
purses for women boxers, especially for high-profile fights,
including world title fights. In 2013, the purses are SO low
for the females, and it does not seem to be improving.
|
|
Legal binding contracts not being worth the paper they are written on
for women boxers.
|
|
Boxers and Boxers teams who declare to news media sources that “No one
will fight them” and in reality, they are the very ones ducking
competent competition, but they continue to buffalo the public.
|
|
(2003) World Champions/former world champions and or top world
contenders, fighting boxers that do not have even one win on their
record.
Update 2013: Little change, although the quality of
fights have improved 10 years later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|