(JAN 19) As the sport of Women's
boxing staggered back to it's corner after the 2008 round, I thought
of Mort Sahl's long ago, ingenuous line. The future of the sport
does lie ahead. That may be the best thing that can be said about
Women's boxing and it's future. Whether that future will bring an
improvement in the fortune of the sport and it's athletes or whether
Women's boxing will continue on the meandering path that has
characterized the last several years seems to be an issue of
interest and concern with the turn into a new year.
Two currently active boxers,
Nicole Woods and Kaliesha
West, proffered passionate, inside the "belt way” assessments of
what needs to be done if their sport is to take it's proper place in
the lineup of women's professional athletics. And anytime a thinking
athlete, from inside a sport, speaks earnestly about what needs to
be done to improve their sport, it is usually with the authority of
a "been there, done that" perspective and makes it well worth
listening to. Woods and West are proof positive of that; both women,
speaking with great earnestness and passion, reiterated the long
standing problems that have plagued the sport and impeded it's
progress. Yes, female boxers are treated much too casually by
promoters, matchmakers and a too large percentage of the boxing
community, certainly relative to their male counterparts. This, in
spite of the fact that female boxers work and train at their sport
at least as hard as any professional boxer, regardless of the
gender. Yes, there are far too many female fighters who simply will
not take a step towards a competitive bout, opting instead to
compile a synthetic record against overmatched opposition. Yes,
there are far too many "title" bouts that hardly deserve ring time.
Both Woods and West articulated, well, the ongoing shortcomings of
the sport, but they stopped short of offering solutions, other than
noting that for the sport and the athletes to succeed, many elements
have to change. A subsequent contributor to the discussion put it
best: "wishin' and hopin' don't make things better....You have to
have a plan."
And Arnie Rosenthal, the
creator of "A Ring of Their Own," perhaps the most innovative
concept in the relatively brief history of modern Women's boxing, is
a man with a plan. The articulation of Rosenthal's plan, like that
of the two boxers, is cogently presented and the points range from
the debatable: all-women's cards are the best venue for female
fighters, to the obvious: it's better for the sport if the bouts are
on television, to the astute: there exists an almost comic
proliferation of titles in Women's boxing and this has essentially
made championships, in the sport, largely irrelevant. Like Woods and
West, Rosenthal speaks from experience. While the AROTO programs did
not achieve planned-for success, the program consistently provided a
well- spring of competitive bouts, featuring some of the best boxers
in the sport fighting not walkover opponents but other good
fighters. And, if only for that reason, Rosenthal deserves to be
included in any discussion of Women's boxing, it's future and the
improvement of the sport.
But here's the problem with all three dissertations. Despite coming
from individuals whose knowledge is irrefutable and who, with their
words, exhibit an unquestioned passion to make the sport better,
neither West, nor Woods, nor Rosenthal make a direct reference to
what is missing in the sport of Women's boxing. Nowhere, do any of
the three mention the word or the concept of leadership. And the
reason is simple: currently, in the sport of Women's boxing, there
is no leadership. There are leaders, in the area of management,
promotion, matchmaking, but, frankly, those leaders, in those areas,
exhibit leadership that is largely parochial in both geography and
interest. Those individuals are concerned, primarily, with a given
fighter or fighters, a given boxing card or a given match-up between
two fighters. No one in the sport of Women's boxing, no one, as the
sport is currently structured, is concerned with the overall
direction and improvement of the entire sport and every boxer
competing in that sport. There is no leadership in the sport of
Women's boxing and the sport and its athletes have largely been
directionless because of that fact. If not the promoters, managers
or matchmakers who will, who should, take the leadership point in
the sport?
Sanctioning is defined as "authoritative approval that makes a
course of action valid via support and encouragement." The sport of
Women's boxing has a number of sanctioning bodies, but it is
questionable whether any of the existing organizations qualify under
the above definition. In the main, instead of guiding and governing
the sport, most sanctioning bodies, in Women's boxing, seem content
to merely observe. All too often, sanctioning bodies permit their
titles to be contested by fights that do not approach championship
quality or competitiveness. This lack of competitive quality, in
what should be "crown jewel" bouts, make these so-called "title"
fights significantly less attractive to mainstream media outlets,
notably television. If sanctioning bodies are not going to respect
the value of their own titles, by presenting the best possible
match-up of female fighters, certainly the outside media elements
cannot be expected to take notice. Additionally, all too often,
faced with controversial decisions, sanctioning bodies employ the
tactic of "let it go, we'lll fix it next time," straining the
perception that the sanctioning body is in control of their own
title belt.
Believe me, this is not a knock on any specific organization, and
it's certainly true that these sanctioning groups are run by
individuals who seek, and will ultimately benefit from, improvement
in the sport of Women's boxing. But, it is, likewise, true, that as
structured today, the sanctioning bodies operating within the sport
of Women's boxing are largely reactive organizations. It is
imperative that these groups become significantly more proactive,
that they take the lead in the sport of Women's boxing rather than
simply noting problems and "cursing the darkness."
How? Begin by eliminating all minor championship titles, those
largely innocuous, irrelevant "international," "junior" and other
minor classifications of "a belt for everyone" mentality. Then and
only then will a sanctioning body's title belt return to singular
prominence. Follow up by being much more selective in granting
sanctions for championship bouts. One good fighter doesn't make a
title fight, it takes two quality boxers, (one directional
suggestion might be that a challenger competing for a title must
come into the title bout having won her last two fights, against
fighters with winning records). In other words, sanctioning bodies
must begin to take pride in their belts, to place those belts on a
hard-to-reach plateau and stop auctioning them off to the highest
bidder. Will this cut down on the number of title fights?
Absolutely, but it will also make those title fights that pass these
heightened qualifications much better bouts, much more compelling to
the fans and the media and, hopefully, to TV. The point is that the
sport has to improve it's product and the good news is that the
current depth of talent in the sport, deeper than ever before in
it's history, can accommodate that goal.
It is simply no longer enough that two boxers in the ring happen to
be female. In today's marketplace, those two females must possess
boxing skills that leave no doubt that they deserve the title
"professional." In point of fact there are too many female bouts
where that is simply not the case and no one should be surprised
that the media has turned a jaundiced eye toward the sport. There
are, of course, several other quality control issues that need to be
implemented in the sport. And it would be a wonderful starting point
if a sanctioning body led the discussion of identifying these issues
and how they can be solved.
Which brings up one other critical point: More women. Almost two
years ago I wrote a piece that premised that there were not enough
women in the sport of Women's boxing, outside the ring: [Link]
It was true then and it's true now. Thus, if the sanctioning bodies
in this sport are going to truly make a difference, there simply has
to be more females in positions of power within those organizations.
I'm not talking about ambassadors in some foreign country, but women
in a decision making position at the "home office." It's simple, the
most valuable element of the sport of Women's boxing is the
fighters, and they're all female. Why then do the vast majority of
sanctioning bodies in this sport have a distinct lack of females at
the top of their hierarchy? Here's the answer......a boy's club
mentality!
There are a number of women, in the
boxing community, waiting for the opportunity to take a shot at
improving the sport. In 2008, Women's boxing achieved it's most
successful venture in "big fight" television exposure as a result of
the involvement of the lone sanctioning body that has a woman in a
position of authority. And, from a matchmaking standpoint, both the
past AROTO program and fight cards in the capital district of New
York have benefited from the ability of women well schooled in what
it takes to put together a quality, competitive female bout."
The future, indeed, lies ahead for Women's boxing. The missing
ingredient for a successful future is leadership. The sanctioning
bodies in the sport are well positioned to fulfill that role. In
point of fact, those organizations may be the only ones capable of
assuming independent, proactive leadership in the sport. Are they
capable of the task? That's something only the WBC, WBA, WIBA, IFBA
and others can answer. They're all charged with sanctioning the
sport in the real sense of the term and, in large part, they're
people who care about and are dedicated to the sport. It's time they
stepped up and assumed the mantle of leadership in their sport. The
future lies ahead.
#
# #
#
For Online IWBHF Tickets for
Next Event!
Check Our Next Annual International
Women's Boxing Hall of Fame Event that we have to celebrate hour IWBHF
Inductees and Special Award Recipients!
Next Event, Go Here!
Our Online
WBAN/IWBHF Online Store
Proceeds from the Online Store is to
continue our mission to support the INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S BOXING HALL OF
FAME. The Official collection includes IWBHF and WBAN Merchandise and
Memorabilia from the WBAN Boxing Collection. We will continue to list
items from the collection and merchandise.