|
(MAY 26) Justice Potter Stewart,
commenting from the bench, on a Supreme Court case (Jacobellis v
Ohio), in 1964, concerning the threshold of obscenity, noted that
while pornography might be difficult to define, ".... I know it when
I see it." Most boxing fans can exhibit a Potter Stewart-like
recognition of championship title fights, they know them when they
see them. In the next month, on successive nights, June 12 and 13 in
Connecticut and New Mexico, respectively, there will be several
Women's boxing title fights, sanctioned by the IFBA, that most
boxing fans, given the level of talent that will enter both rings,
will have no trouble recognizing as championship bouts.
The following night, June 14, in Mexico City, the World Boxing
Council is presenting a bout that the sanctioning body purports to
be a title match, specifically for the vacant WBC International
Female welterweight title. Let's ignore, for a moment, the red flag
that is automatically raised any time a bout is announced as being
for an "International" title of any sort (or for that matter, a
"Junior" championship belt). The operative phrase for these boxing
exhibitions is "caveat emptor," and, any potential ticket buyer for
the Mexico City bout, expecting to witness a championship quality
bout, should, indeed, beware. The fighters competing in Mexico City
are Mia St. John and Amy Yuratovac.
It has been said, specifically by Bill Parcells, the football coach,
that "you are what your record says you are." Taken at face value,
this dictum would seem to indicate that the St.John/Yuratovac bout
has a championship aura. Mia St. John comes into the bout with a
43-9-2 record, while
Amy Yuratovac
has won six of seven bouts; her lone defeat coming to Christy
Martin. However, in the case of the June 14 bout, I yield to the
words of a long-gone bookmaker, who held sway in a gin mill on Coney
Island Avenue and who was quite facile with numbers and their
implications. Gerry Connors never hesitated to to tell me, "It's not
what the number is, it's what the number means."
During Mia St. John's professional career, her 43 wins have come
against opponents who, cumulatively, had a winning percentage below
50%. For much of her early years in the ring, St. John simply
overwhelmed overmatched fighters. To be fair, as her career
progressed, St. John did step up in competition against fighters
with considerably better records and considerably more skill. Those
bouts, primarily, accounted for her nine losses, beginning with
Christy Martin in December 2002.
Amy Yuratovac fought Martin a year ago, losing a six round shutout,
for the only loss on her record. It is her six wins that gives
one pause. The first five came against fighters who did not have a
victory on their records, two were debut boxers. After the Martin
loss, Yuratovac came back with
a first round TKO, in October, against Jasmine Davis, a 1-5
fighter. It was the fifth straight time Davis had failed to get past
the first round. Two fighters, with a combined total of 49 wins
would seem to be a qualitative "lock" for a reputable championship
bout. That's not an easy case to make for the bout the WBC has
designated for the International Female welterweight title on June
14 in Mexico City.
And that's where the blame for this farce of a championship bout
lies, squarely on the WBC. It's not on the boxers; fighters fight.
And any athlete who summons the courage to step into a professional
boxing ring deserves recognition for that courage; boxing is the
most brutal and dangerous of sports. Likewise, boxers have every
right to maximize their financial return from the sport by taking
every fight that is offered them. I'm fairly confident that the June
14 bout in Mexico City will provide Mia St. John and, I hope, Amy
Yuratovac, with a relatively good payday.
But it is the WBC, one of the sanctioning organizations charged with
providing oversight of the sport of Women's boxing, one of the
sanctioning organizations specifically charged with the
responsibility of conferring championship status on bouts, that is
found wanting in this case. There is scant evidence that the WBC has
provided the necessary oversight in regard to their International
Female welterweight title. Rather, it might be argued, that by
presenting such a bout as the one scheduled for June 14, the
organization has, in effect, devalued their own championship title.
The St. John/Yuratovac bout does not, by any expansion of the
definition, deserve the status of a title fight. There are, today,
simply too many good female fighters who continue to hone their
skill in this sport and who, based on that skill level, deserve a
chance at a title belt far in advance of either Mia St. John or Amy
Yuratovac. St. John's original opponent was Rita Figueroa, a 10-0
fighter from Chicago, who had compiled her record against,
decidedly, middle-of-the-pack opposition (none of her ten wins were
against fighters with winning records, although she did have a
no-contest against another up and coming Midwest fighter, Mary
McGee.) Figueroa dropped out of the St. John bout after sustaining
an undisclosed injury. The St. John/Figueroa bout would have been a
marginally better match-up, but that bout would have, likewise, been
open for debate concerning it's championship fight qualification.
That the WBC, with it's long history and lofty reputation in the
sport of boxing, cannot come up with a better bout for one of it's
championship titles seems somewhat ludicrous. I hope this is not a
result of the organization's inability or unwillingness to provide
proper emphasis or attention to the sport of Women's boxing and the
prestige of it's female title belts. The fighters and the fans, who
support the sport, deserve better from this leading boxing
organization.
Boxing fans do recognize championship bouts when they see them.
They'll see them on June 12 in Uncasville, CT, when Alicia Ashley,
Lisa Brown and Elena Reid step into the ring. The following night in
Albuquerque, NM, they'll see them again with Holly Holm, Mary Jo
Sanders, Jeannine Garside, Chevelle Hallback, Carina Moreno and
Eileen Olszewski, among others. The IFBA has done an outstanding job
lining up two cards with outstanding female boxing talent while
providing all too rare television exposure for both programs. I hope
these two boxing cards, on Fox Sports TV on the 12th and on PPV the
following night, generate the type of audience that the talent in
the ring deserves. I, likewise, hope that included in that audience
are the WBC officials charged with future Women's boxing title
fights.
|
|
|
|