If the Ann Wolfe/Lisa Ested six round
bout on ESPN2 on Friday night were a restaurant I would have given
it two star review: good, not great. Good, certainly in relation to
the usual female boxing fare that ESPN foists on it's viewers. But,
unfortunately, the Wolfe/Ested affair turned out to be yet another
female bout in which the winner was all but predetermined before the
opening bell. The fight on Friday was only a bit more than a
showcase for Ann Wolfe, in her continuing, Ahab-like quest for a
Laila Ali fight. Wolfe was, in the final analysis, in against a
competent, but overmatched opponent. However, the six rounds were
valuable as a current assessment of Ann Wolfe and her ring bona
fides.
The first indication of the fight's "story line" was announcer Joe
Tessitore's imploring of the audience to stay tuned for "Ann Wolfe's
remarks about her rival, Laila Ali." (Tessitore, by the way, may
have come close to the modern day record of referring to a specific
magazine as he continually repeated Ring Magazine's "pound for pound
female ranking" [Ali, followed by Wolfe] as if he were on commission
selling subscriptions for "Ring"). The second hint that there was
but one attraction in this bout was ESPN's insistence on referring
to Wolfe's opponent as "Lisa Smith," in the on-air runup to the
bout. The fighter is listed in every available record compilation as
Lisa Ested. It was not until moments before the bout that the name
Lisa Ested Smith finally made an appearance on the screen. This may
be little more than further evidence that ESPN's knowledge of the
sport of Women's boxing goes only slightly past the cursory level.
The bout, itself, all six rounds, was dominated by Wolfe (how one
judge managed to see a round that he thought Ested had won is beyond
my comprehension and I suspect most of the boxing fans tuned in).
Ested came out for the opening bell firmly ensconced in a survival
mode, prompting a Tessitore comment that Ested had told him, in a
pre fight interview session, that going six rounds was one of her
goals. Ested's ring experience (14 fights) was a major factor as she
spent almost the entire bout backpedaling and when it appeared that
Wolfe had achieved punching distance, Ested immediately sought out a
clinch.
Ann Wolfe, on the other hand, in my mind, has notably improved
several parts of her "game" in the ring. On Friday, Ann exhibited a
"working" jab, replacing what, in the past, closely resembled a
pawing motion, whose only function seemed to be to set up a big
right hand. Wolfe has also learned the value of going to the body,
in lieu of continually "headhunting" as she has done in past bouts.
Also, on Friday night, Wolfe continually showcased a potentially
potent uppercut. Ested, however, did not appear to be in any trouble
throughout the bout although Wolfe did score, at times, with the
uppercut. As in past fights, Wolfe continues to miss an inordinate
number of punches and this seems directly attributable to her
penchant to "load up" for big right hands. To me, through the filter
of a TV screen, however, the most marked improvement in Wolfe's
"skills set" is her ability to pace herself throughout a bout.
Previously, Ann Wolfe had a tendency to wear out after three or four
rounds and in longer bouts usually had to "take a couple of rounds
off" in order to gain a "second wind." On Friday night, Wolfe seemed
as fresh at the end of the bout as in the first round. In fact, in
round five, Wolfe was able to pick up the pace considerably as it
appeared she was trying for a KO. She didn't get it, but the fact
that she had the ability to step up the tempo after four rounds is
proof that she not only realizes the value of pacing but that she
has learned the technique well.
The Tessitore-touted "remarks about her rival, Laila Ali," likewise,
seemed, at least to me, to show a different Ann Wolfe. No longer,
the frenetic, hyperactive talker, Wolfe now comes across in
modulated, tempered tones and offers well reasoned rationales as to
her career, her life outside the ring and particularly to her long
quest to get in the ring with Laila Ali. She noted, convincingly,
that prior offers for such a bout were embarrassingly, even
insultingly, inadequate, in terms of the financial shares for each
fighter. She argued, reasonably, that both she and Laila Ali deserve
a fair share of any purse and also, intriguingly, proffered a
"winner take all" purse arrangement similar to the split that was
proposed for the ill-fated Christy Martin/Lucia Rijker bout.
Hopefully, the Wolfe/Ali bout will happen. But, as a smart lady once
told me: "The answer to almost every question in sports is one word,
money." Let's hope that some time in the future, boxing fans won't
use that one word to answer the question: "Why didn't Laila Ali ever
fight Ann Wolfe?" Who wins? Who cares! Teddy Atlas gives the edge,
as he said on Friday night, to Ali. Most people would probably
agree. But the fact is Ann Wolfe has more than a "puncher's chance"
and she proved Friday night that she has the skills, and those
skills have improved, to merit the opportunity. Anne Wolfe is ready
and she's been waiting a long time, too long.
Bernie McCoy